M2.7 Earthquake near Chignik Lake, United States — 02 April 2025, 16:39 UTC
A minor earthquake of magnitude 2.7 was recorded near Chignik Lake, United States on , with an epicentre 142 km north-northwest of Chignik Lake, at a focal depth of 40.0 km. It ranked as the 304th strongest of 6994 earthquakes recorded in the United States in the preceding 30 days.
Time (UTC): 2025-04-02 16:39:46
Time (your timezone): —
Magnitude: 2.7 (minor)
Focal depth: 40.0 km (shallow)
Epicentre: 57.3373, -160.0020
Location: 142 km NNW of Chignik Lake, Alaska
Country: United States
USGS link to NOAA tsunami information: Not linked
Review status: Automatic
Source: USGS event page
How strong was this earthquake?
Minor earthquakes in this range are felt by people close to the epicentre as a brief jolt or rattle, but they very rarely cause any damage.
A magnitude 2.7 earthquake radiates roughly 169 kg of TNT equivalent in seismic energy.
The USGS assigns this earthquake a significance score of 112, which is below the USGS threshold of more than 600 for its significant-earthquake list. The ranking combines magnitude with available Did You Feel It responses and PAGER alert level; it is not a direct measurement of damage.
Where was the epicentre?
The epicentre was located at 57.3373, -160.0020 — 142 km north-northwest of Chignik Lake. The closest other recorded event was a magnitude 2.1 earthquake 88 km south of here on 07 August 2026.
Why the 40 km depth matters
At 40 km this was a shallow earthquake. Shallow events release their energy close to the surface, so for a given magnitude they produce noticeably stronger shaking — and more damage — than deeper ones. Roughly three quarters of all earthquakes worldwide occur at shallow depths.
This catalogue does not ingest eyewitness responses, so it cannot confirm where this earthquake was felt. Based on magnitude alone, an event this size may be noticed locally, especially close to the epicentre. Its shallow focus makes stronger surface shaking more likely than for a deeper event of the same magnitude.
What does the tsunami information flag mean?
The USGS record does not carry a link to NOAA tsunami information. That field is not an all-clear and does not state whether a tsunami occurred. In this case, a damaging tsunami would be less likely because at M2.7 it falls below the magnitude 6.5 threshold that generally applies before a submarine earthquake displaces enough water to generate a damaging tsunami; it occurred inland rather than beneath the sea floor. For an active coastal alert, use tsunami.gov or your local warning authority.
How earthquakes generate tsunamis, and what the alert levels mean →
Aftershocks and local seismic history
9 further earthquakes have been recorded within about 150 km of the epicentre in the seven days after this event, the largest of them magnitude 1.5.
5 earthquakes of magnitude 4 or above have been logged within roughly 200 km of this epicentre in our catalogue. The strongest was a magnitude 4.6 event near Ivanof Bay on 19 February 2025. This M2.7 event released about 708 times less energy than that event.
How long aftershock sequences last, and how large they get →
Where this event sits in the record
This earthquake is part of the April 2025 worldwide record, and of earthquakes in the United States during April 2025. Browse the full monthly archive to compare periods.
Nearest recorded earthquakes to this epicentre
- M2.1 earthquake near Ivanof Bay, United States — (88 km S)
- M0.2 earthquake near Chignik Lake, United States — (120 km SSE)
- M1.1 earthquake near Ivanof Bay, United States — (130 km SSE)
- M-0.0 earthquake near Ivanof Bay, United States — (131 km SSE)
- M0.2 earthquake near Ivanof Bay, United States — (131 km SSE)
- M3.5 earthquake near Chignik Lagoon, United States — (132 km SE)
- M1.2 earthquake near Ivanof Bay, United States — (132 km SSE)
- M1.1 earthquake near Chignik Lagoon, United States — (133 km SE)
- M-0.0 earthquake near Ivanof Bay, United States — (133 km SSE)
- M0.0 earthquake near Ivanof Bay, United States — (134 km SSE)
Other recent earthquakes in the United States
- M1.0 earthquake near Coso Junction, United States —
- M0.7 earthquake near Cobb, United States —
- M1.9 earthquake near Chickaloon, United States —
- M1.1 earthquake near The Geysers, United States —
- M1.6 earthquake near Coso Junction, United States —
- M1.6 earthquake near Chase, United States —
- M1.2 earthquake near Gardendale, United States —
- M0.3 earthquake near Julian, United States —
- M1.6 earthquake near Olancha, United States —
- M2.8 earthquake near Toms Place, United States —
Other magnitude 2 earthquakes worldwide
- M2.9 earthquake near San Antonio, Puerto Rico —
- M2.6 earthquake near Pleasant Hill, Louisiana —
- M2.4 earthquake near Skwentna, Alaska —
- M2.9 earthquake near Toms Place, CA —
- M3.0 earthquake near San Antonio, Puerto Rico —
- M2.6 earthquake near Pilot Point, Alaska —
- M2.7 earthquake near Ugashik, Alaska —
- M2.6 earthquake near Ouzinkie, Alaska —
Questions about this earthquake
How strong is a magnitude 2.7 earthquake?
Minor earthquakes in this range are felt by people close to the epicentre as a brief jolt or rattle, but they very rarely cause any damage. A magnitude 2.7 earthquake radiates roughly 169 kg of TNT equivalent in seismic energy.
How deep was the earthquake near Chignik Lake?
At 40 km this was a shallow earthquake. Shallow events release their energy close to the surface, so for a given magnitude they produce noticeably stronger shaking — and more damage — than deeper ones. Roughly three quarters of all earthquakes worldwide occur at shallow depths.
Was the M2.7 earthquake near Chignik Lake felt?
This catalogue does not ingest eyewitness responses, so it cannot confirm where this earthquake was felt. Based on magnitude alone, an event this size may be noticed locally, especially close to the epicentre. Its shallow focus makes stronger surface shaking more likely than for a deeper event of the same magnitude.
What does the USGS tsunami field mean for this event?
The USGS record does not carry a link to NOAA tsunami information. That field is not an all-clear and does not state whether a tsunami occurred. In this case, a damaging tsunami would be less likely because at M2.7 it falls below the magnitude 6.5 threshold that generally applies before a submarine earthquake displaces enough water to generate a damaging tsunami; it occurred inland rather than beneath the sea floor. For an active coastal alert, use tsunami.gov or your local warning authority.
Have there been aftershocks?
9 further earthquakes have been recorded within about 150 km of the epicentre in the seven days after this event, the largest of them magnitude 1.5.
How often do earthquakes happen near Chignik Lake?
5 earthquakes of magnitude 4 or above have been logged within roughly 200 km of this epicentre in our catalogue. The strongest was a magnitude 4.6 event near Ivanof Bay on 19 February 2025. This M2.7 event released about 708 times less energy than that event.